Published in Surge Article Objections on July 18, 2017 by Convention Of States Project
Surge Article 4: Charles J. Cooper, a long-time constitutional law litigator for the NRA, outlines in this article why a Convention of States poses no threat to the Second Amendment.
Read more ›Published in Surge Article Solution on July 18, 2017 by Convention Of States Project
Surge Article 9: Michael Farris explains in this article how Common Core represents one of the federal government's most serious abuses of state's rights.
Read more ›Published in Surge Article Objections on July 18, 2017 by Convention Of States Project
Surge Article 13: Many myths surround the Article V process. Rita Dunaway puts five of the most common to rest in this article.
Read more ›Published in Surge Article Solution on July 18, 2017 by Convention Of States Project
Surge Article 15: Rita Dunaway explains in this article how the feds have taken over every aspect of American life, and how We the People can evict them.
Read more ›Published in Surge Article Process on July 18, 2017 by Convention Of States Project
Surge Article 22: This simple, two-page document outlines everything you need to know about the Article V process.
Read more ›Published in Surge Article Solution on July 18, 2017 by Convention Of States Project
Surge Article 23: The federal takeover of western lands is getting out of control. As Ken Ivory explains in this piece, a Convention of States can help rein in this troubling federal practice.
Read more ›Published in Surge Article Solution on July 18, 2017 by Convention Of States Project
Surge Article 2: In this piece, Prof. Rob Natelson responds to the objection that constitutional amendments will be a futile means of restraining federal power. In reality, constitutional amendments like women's suffrage have proven to be remarkably effective.
Read more ›Published in Surge Article Process on July 18, 2017 by Convention Of States Project
Surge Article 5: In this piece, Prof. Rob Natelson refutes modern conservative naysayers by tracing the history and development of our COS knowledge.
Read more ›Published in Surge Article Process on July 18, 2017 by Convention Of States Project
Surge Article 8: In this piece, Michael Farris summarizes why it is still essential for states that have adopted a balanced budget amendment to fight for a convention of states.
Read more ›Published in Surge Article Solution on July 18, 2017 by Convention Of States Project
Surge Article 10: Bob Berry outlines in this piece the beginnings of the modern Article V movement and where the "new reformers" might go in the future.
Read more ›Published in Surge Article Objections on July 18, 2017 by Convention Of States Project
Surge Article 14: As Ken Quinn outlines in this piece, there is a huge difference between what the states did in 1787 and what they'll do at a Convention of States.
Read more ›Published in Surge Article Objections on July 18, 2017 by Convention Of States Project
Surge Article 21: The John Birch Society claims to have always opposed an Article V Convention of States, but as Ken Quinn outlines in this article, that may not be the case.
Read more ›Published in Surge Article Solution on July 18, 2017 by Convention Of States Project
Surge Article 1: This article by Michael Farris outlines the four most serious abuses perpetrated by the federal government and how a Convention of States can stop each of them.
Read more ›Published in Surge Article Process on July 18, 2017 by Convention Of States Project
Surge Article 6: In this piece, Prof. Rob Natelson walks through the history of the courts supporting and strengthening Article V.
Read more ›Published in Surge Article Process on July 18, 2017 by Convention Of States Project
Article 20: Rob Natelson explains in this article why the Necessary and Proper Clause does not allow Congress to control a Convention of States. Only the states are permitted to dictate what happens at an amendments convention.
Read more ›