The lawsuit Brunson v. Adams has gained quite a following from Americans still questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election.
The case was brought by Raland Brunson against 388 federal officers, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and Mike Pence for failing to assess warnings about illegal votes from several states. Under Rule 11, the case was fast-tracked to the Supreme Court earlier this year because of its impact on national security.
The Supreme Court declined to hear the original case, but Brunson has announced he is moving to Plan D with his brother, Loy Brunson.
SEE ALSO: SCOTUS considers lawsuit surrounding 2020 election that could oust Biden & Harris
“Plan D – In order for us to move our brother Loy's case to the Supreme Court, we need to move it to the appellate court," Raland Brunson wrote on Tuesday. “It was two years ago (April 1, 2021) that Loy first paid the filing fee to have his complaint filed in the Federal Court. Loy gave them the filing fee, but they didn't file it. They actually accepted the filing fee but held onto the complaint without filing it. I mean, what the heck?”
The federal court eventually decided to file Loy’s complaint and ordered a dismissal, which allows for an appeal. Plan D includes filing a "Notice of Appeal" to the Federal Court, which Loy did this week. This lets the court know that the plaintiff is moving the case to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals (the Appellate Court).
“The plan is that as soon as it's filed in the appellate court, we are going to do a Rule 11 and move it to the Supreme Court. It will take several days, up to a couple of weeks for this to be officially filed in the Court of Appeals.”
Both cases argue that federal officials violated their oath to defend the Constitution by certifying the 2020 election without any investigation after receiving reasonable pleas. The Brunson brothers' suits are not about the legality of the 2020 election, but rather government officials’ commitments to defend the Constitution by taking the oath of office.
“Our goal and intention of this lawsuit is to have all the defendants be removed from office, and that the words "under penalty of perjury" be added at the end of the Oath of Office, making it binding, making the penalty (as outlined in 18 USC) enforceable.”
Raland said the Supreme Court is getting more and more letters and affidavits letting them know that this is about "We The People" and not just about four brothers who want their freedom protected.
SEE UPDATE: Brunson brothers' second election lawsuit enters Supreme Court docket
Convention of States is working to restore the federal government to its original purpose, returning power to the states and the people. Sign the Convention of States petition below to show your support.
