This website uses cookies to improve your experience.

Please enable cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website

Sign the petition

to call for a

Convention of States!

signatures

How the Supreme Court became the most powerful branch of the federal government

Published in Blog on December 03, 2019 by Convention Of States

6268 big

The following was written by Convention of States National Legislative Strategist Rita Dunaway and originally published on WND.com.

“We need more Republicans in 2018 and must ALWAYS hold the Supreme Court!”

This tweet by President Trump naturally ruffled the feathers of liberal pundits, but it points to a particular perversion of our federal system that should be troubling to all of us: a highly politicized and virtually omnipotent judiciary.

The founders expected the judiciary to be the “least dangerous” branch of government; the neutral arbiter of legal questions according to the written laws adopted pursuant to the political process. But today, that would be a poor description of what the court actually does.

Thanks to the idea that we live under an “organic Constitution” whose meaning changes with the times, many federal judges today are not so much neutral arbiters as they are linguistic contortionists, twisting the black-and-white words of our Constitution to accommodate shape-shifting societal values.

In the hands of judges allowed to operate according to this philosophy, the Constitution cannot effectively define or limit government power. As long as we permit judges to reinvent the meaning of the words and phrases that frame our government, the political persuasion of those judges will not only be relevant, but key.

Do they think the Affordable Care Act is a good idea? Then they will just announce that Congress’ taxation power allows it to penalize individuals for not purchasing a qualifying policy. Voila – a precedent declaring Congress to have a power that neither a single Founding Father nor intellectually honest modern-day reader would have ever perceived from constitutional text.

The late Justice Antonin Scalia once lamented, “The Court must be living in another world. Day by day, case by case, it is busy designing a Constitution for a country I do not recognize.” A Court with the power to do this is guaranteed to be a politicized Court, and the government of which it is a part will be one whose boundaries are constantly moving.

If we all agree that this is problematic – if we prefer the rule of law to the rule of judges – then we should unite to restore a judiciary that decides cases on the basis of what is actually written in the law. Where the law is silent, the question is left to the political process.

But how do we get back to this?

The long-term solution is constitutional amendment. Through an amendment, we should instruct the court to strictly construe the enumerated powers of the federal government according to the meaning of the words when written, and that while the people’s liberties should be interpreted broadly, new “rights” may only be codified by legislatures or added pursuant to Article V’s constitutional amendment process; they may not be created by the courts.

The effect of this kind of permanent rule of constitutional interpretation would be not only to restrict the courts to doing what courts were meant to do, but also to put the rest of the federal government back inside its constitutional fences. It would require federal courts to strike down the myriad actions and policies of federal agencies, institutions and officials that are not directly tied to an enumerated federal power as those powers were originally understood.

This, in turn, would restore a robust federal system in which state and local governments – which are much more responsive to the people – determine the vast majority of the laws and policies that govern us.

Despite what some may suggest, interpreting the Constitution strictly according to its original meaning doesn’t relegate us to life with an outdated Constitution. When changes are truly needed, they simply must be made and approved by “we, the people,” according to the process we all agreed upon (in Article V) rather than made by judicial fiat.

This is what it looks like to live under the rule of law.

We have long complained about illegitimate “judicial activism” and the ways it has undermined our self-governance. It is time for the states to use the tool the Constitution provides in Article V to curtail judicial tyranny once and for all.

How a federal judge – and especially a Supreme Court justice – will interpret the supreme law of our land is too significant to be merely a litmus test used by partisan politicians in the appointment process. It should be a black-and-white mandate to the judiciary contained in the Constitution itself.

Sign the petition to call for a Convention of States!

1,457,640 signatures

Petition your state legislator

Almost everyone knows that our federal government is on a dangerous course. The unsustainable debt combined with crushing regulations on states and businesses is a recipe for disaster.

What is less known is that the Founders gave state legislatures the power to act as a final check on abuses of power by Washington, DC. Article V of the U.S. Constitution authorizes the state legislatures to call a convention for proposing needed amendments to the Constitution. This process does not require the consent of the federal government in Washington, DC.

I support the Convention of States Project; a national effort to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution, restricted to proposing amendments that will impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit its power and jurisdiction, and impose term limits on its officials and members of Congress.

I want our state to be one of the necessary 34 states to pass a resolution calling for this kind of Article V Convention. You can find a copy of the model resolution and the Article V Pocket Guide (which explains the process and answers many questions) here: https://conventionofstates.com/handbook_pdf

I ask that you support the Convention of States Project and consider becoming a co-sponsor of the resolution. Please respond to my request by informing the national COS team of your position, or sending them any questions you may have:

info@conventionofstates.com or (540) 441-7227.

Thank you so much for your service to the people of our district.

Respectfully, [Your Name]

Msg & Data rates may apply. Msg frequency varies. Text HELP for Help or text STOP to end messages. View Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Provide your full address and we will deliver your petition directly to your state legislators now and again during the legislative sessions, Free of Charge. We Protect your privacy.

We welcome all US citizens to support our movement by signing the petition. To deliver the petition to your state legislators, you must enter your full address, which must be within one of the 50 states. For military personnel serving overseas, or for expatriates, enter your Voting Residence Address .

Please be sure to check the "Send me email updates" box, and include your phone number above.

How did you hear about us:

Click here to get involved!
Convention of states action

Are you sure you don't want emailed updates on our progress and local events? We respect your privacy, but we don't want you to feel left out!

Processing...