This website uses cookies to improve your experience.

Please enable cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website

Sign the petition

to call for a

Convention of States!

signatures
Columns Default Settings

Article V through the years: Postwar Conservatism

Published in Blog on April 15, 2025 by Jakob Fay

The conservative giants of the second half of the 1900s — Ronald Reagan, Antonin Scalia, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Milton Friedman — supported the Article V convention process.

This should come as no surprise. The latter half of the 20th Century was marked by a robust conservative movement. A worthy response to the Progressive Era’s emphasis on big government programs and loose interpretation of the Constitution, the postwar conservatives sought to restore the Founders’ vision of limited government and combat Progressive Era spinoffs, including the “Great Society.”

Even as sitting politicians began to question whether the Constitution was “outmoded” — mainly because it obstructed their quest for an all-benevolent nanny state — conservatives touted the nation’s founding charter as a legal defense against a potentially tyrannical federal government. It only makes sense, then, that many of them embraced the Article V convention as the constitutional safeguard against an oppressive government.

Nobel Prize-winning economist and outspoken proponent of capitalism Milton Friedman, for example, endorsed the call for an Article V convention as “the one device that can effectively bypass the Washington bureaucracy.” He contended that the federal government was structurally broken, requiring structural remedies.

“In my opinion, the only feasible way of stopping tax increases is via constitutional limitation on government spending and government taxes,” he said. “We must not kid ourselves into thinking we are going to remedy it by the easy way of electing the right people into office. That will not work.”

That not even Friedman regarded it as problematic to acknowledge the existence of a “defect in our political structure” is telling.

President Dwight D. Eisenhower may have favored limited government, but he did less to oppose big government programs than many of his fellow Republicans would have liked. Nevertheless, the war hero turned politician pulled off the seemingly impossible: he balanced the federal budget. Thrice.

Much like Friedman, Eisenhower worried about the “distant bureaucracy.” The Founders may have foreseen many things, but, he pointed out, they could not possibly have predicted “that, in the space of three lifetimes, the Republic would extend from the Atlantic three thousand miles out into the Pacific, or overleaping an independent neighbor would reach into the Arctic. … They could not know that in less than two centuries the immensity of domestic and international affairs would tend to create in us a feeling of individual helplessness and even lead us into an unthinking abandonment of personal and local responsibility to a few men in government, giving to them a frightening power for good or evil; and almost certain to invite error or abuse.”

He was worried that Americans were slowly yielding their ability to govern themselves. Fortunately, he added, “the Founders provided a final and decisive means of reformation and restoration by the people themselves. Through their state legislatures and without regard to the federal government, the people can demand and participate in constitutional conventions in which they can, through their own action, adopt such amendments as will reverse any trends they see as fatal to true representative government.”

Eisenhower offered his hearty approval: “[I]f you and your generation fortified by a superb education, with access to the knowledge and wisdom of the ages, and imbued with the spirit of our founders, decide that reformation of a radical kind becomes due — then I say, let nothing stop you! Study, examine, survey, think, consider, decide, and then — by all means — act!”

But what about a “runaway convention”? Wasn’t Eisenhower fearful the American people, acting through the Constitution, might rewrite the Constitution? Sixteen years after Eisenhower’s speech, the future Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia explained why constitutionalists need not worry about a runaway convention.

Responding to opponents’ hyped-up fears about “bad amendments” emerging from a convention, Scalia satirically replied, “All those things are possible, I suppose, just as it is possible that the Congress tomorrow might pass a law abolishing social security as of the next day, or eliminating Christmas.”

As for Scalia, he revealed he had “no fear that such extreme proposals” would ever survive the convention process.

“The Founders inserted this alternative method of obtaining constitutional amend­ments,” he believed, “because they knew the Congress would be unwilling to give attention to many issues the people are concerned with, particularly those involving restrictions on the federal government’s own power. The Founders foresaw that, and they provided the convention as a remedy. If the only way to get that convention is to take this minimal risk, then it is a reasonable one.”

Friedman pushing for constitutional spending limitations, Eisenhower sounding the alarm about the loss of self-government, Scalia urging restrictions on the federal government’s power — they all paved the way for Ronald Reagan

The Great Communicator naturally supported calls for an Article V convention. After all, “We can’t depend on Congress to discipline itself . . . .”

“Fortunately, our Nation’s Founders gave us the means to amend the Constitution through action of state legislatures,” he said. “Unless we act quickly, the people in the White House and those running Congress will bankrupt America.”

The story of the 20th Century tells of how the federal government continued to grow seemingly unchecked. However, it also tells of how constitutionally-minded individuals pushed back against federal excesses, urging the states and the people to employ Article V.

If they were concerned about the size of the federal government (when the national debt was less than one trillion dollars), we can only imagine how forcefully they would argue for an Article V convention today. Even as we continue their fight, it’s humbling to know that men like Dwight D. Eisenhower and Ronald Reagan would have supported our efforts. 

If you would like to join them, sign the COS petition below to show your support for an Article V convention to limit federal spending, power, and terms of office!

Sign the petition to call for an Article V convention!

2,703,238 signatures

Petition your state legislator

Almost everyone knows that our federal government is on a dangerous course. The unsustainable debt combined with crushing regulations on states and businesses is a recipe for disaster.

What is less known is that the Founders gave state legislatures the power to act as a final check on abuses of power by Washington, DC. Article V of the U.S. Constitution authorizes the state legislatures to call a convention to proposing needed amendments to the Constitution. This process does not require the consent of the federal government in Washington DC.

I support Convention of States; a national movement to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution, restricted to proposing amendments that will impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit its power and jurisdiction, and impose term limits on its officials and members of Congress.

I want our state to be one of the necessary 34 states to pass a resolution calling for this kind of an Article V convention. You can find a copy of the model resolution and the Article V Pocket Guide (which explains the process and answers many questions) here: https://conventionofstates.com/handbook_pdf

I ask that you support Convention of States and consider becoming a co-sponsor. Please respond to my request by informing the national COS team of your position, or sending them any questions you may have:

info@conventionofstates.com or (540) 441-7227.

Thank you so much for your service to the people of our district.

Respectfully, [Your Name]

By checking this box, you agree to receive text messages sent via an “autodialer”. Our text messages are intended to inform you of events, calls to action, volunteering opportunities, and other matters pertaining to self-governance. Text STOP to stop receiving messages. Text HELP for more info. Message frequency varies. Message and data rates may apply. View Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Provide your full address and we will deliver your petition directly to your state legislators now and again during the legislative sessions, Free of Charge. We Protect your privacy.

We welcome all US citizens to support our movement by signing the petition. To deliver the petition to your state legislators, you must enter your full address, which must be within one of the 50 states. For military personnel serving overseas, or for expatriates, enter your Voting Residence Address .

Please be sure to check the "Send me email updates" box, and include your phone number above.

How did you hear about us:


Click here to get involved!
Convention of states action

Are you sure you don't want emailed updates on our progress and local events? We respect your privacy, but we don't want you to feel left out!

Processing...