This website uses cookies to improve your experience.

Please enable cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website

Sign the petition

to call for a

Convention of States!


Lessons from history: Why pride has made us ignorant

Published in Blog on March 24, 2023 by Jakob Fay

Of America’s many faults today, one of the deadliest is no doubt that she is too proud to learn from history. Actually, twenty-first-century Americans seem to fall into one of two clashing camps: those who have great respect and appreciation for American history (and tend to think all of our problems would be solved if we became more like our past) and those who think it is an unworthy, morally compromised teacher (and tend to think all of our problems will be solved as we become less like our past).

There is at least a bit of pride in both camps, I would argue. History itself can make one proud. But to honestly, freely study and learn from history is a humbling experience.

To study history – without partiality to what one might find – lays bare to the individual and nation the terrifying truth that we might all be grossly wrong about something wholly “settled” to the modern mind. The past might be laughing at us. Our brightest, most impressive, highbrow intellectualism might be brought to shame if we dared introduce it to “real history.” Even more terrifying, a willingness to learn from history stipulates a willingness to change if the lessons of history so dictate.

For these reasons, many would rather not look at history at all. Naively, they assume that humanity has reached its pinnacle and is now immune to systematic error. They assume we have somehow dodged the common pitfalls that have plagued mankind relentlessly since Eden.

SEE ALSO: What Federalist No. 85 says about Convention of States

They would never say such things out loud, of course. In fact, if they were introspectively honest, they might admit to a tucked away, inbred fear that these things are not so. But they do not have the humility – or the courage – to test their assumption against history.

They have staked a whole nation on unteachable pride, or what C.S. Lewis called “chronological snobbery.”

Then there are those who study selectively. Those who learn just enough about history to conclude that there is nothing to be learned from history.

They teach history but do not let it teach us.

This is the story of the 1619 Project, for example. Nikole Hannah-Jones’ history-bereft reframing of America cherrypicks stories that corroborate her pre-conceived supposition. It “teaches” that modern America has no need to emulate pre-modern America in any way, and to do so, is actually problematic. In other words, we can learn from history only insofar as it confirms we should not actually learn from history.

Notice the following 1619 Project headlines:

“What does a traffic jam in Atlanta have to do with segregation? Quite a lot.”

“Why doesn’t the United States have universal health care? The answer begins with policies enacted after the Civil War.”

“Slavery gave America a fear of black people and a taste for violent punishment. Both still define our prison system.”

“The sugar that saturates the American diet has a barbaric history as the ‘white gold’ that fueled slavery.”

“Our democracy’s founding ideals were false when they were written. Black Americans have fought to make them true.”

What do these headlines all have in common? They each come to the same conclusion: Modernity is superior; the past is inferior; therefore, we have no need to look into it any further.

SEE ALSO: Looking for Statesmen of Honor and Integrity

Nikole Hannah-Jones selectively “studies” history she knows will lead to this conclusion and this conclusion alone. She does not let the past speak for itself.

But real history does not work that way. Real history is untamable; it stubbornly refuses to be molded to any one agenda. As famed historian Will Durant observed, real history is marked by a “troublesome duplexity.” 

“History smiles at all attempts to force its flow into theoretical patterns or logical grooves; it plays havoc with our generalizations, breaks all our rules; history is baroque,” writes Durant.

This does not mean we cannot learn from history. It means we must accept the humbling fact that history says what it will whether we like it or not. If, as the 1619 Project claims, history really does confirm that America’s sugar-saturated diet does have a “barbaric history,” so be it. But this does not mean we can close off our minds to the other lessons history also teaches.

Even in this “enlightened” age, it behooves us to disavow and emulate the past. When we are only critical, we miss out on so much. 

As schoolmaster, history says basically three things: In the past, mankind has been guilty of great atrocities.

In the past, mankind has also been responsible for great good.

You, modern man, are capable of both.

If we are too proud to heed these lessons we may end up on the “great atrocities” side of history and not even realize it.

Sign the petition to call for an Article V convention!

2,575,581 signatures

Petition your state legislator

Almost everyone knows that our federal government is on a dangerous course. The unsustainable debt combined with crushing regulations on states and businesses is a recipe for disaster.

What is less known is that the Founders gave state legislatures the power to act as a final check on abuses of power by Washington, DC. Article V of the U.S. Constitution authorizes the state legislatures to call a convention to proposing needed amendments to the Constitution. This process does not require the consent of the federal government in Washington DC.

I support Convention of States; a national movement to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution, restricted to proposing amendments that will impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit its power and jurisdiction, and impose term limits on its officials and members of Congress.

I want our state to be one of the necessary 34 states to pass a resolution calling for this kind of an Article V convention. You can find a copy of the model resolution and the Article V Pocket Guide (which explains the process and answers many questions) here:

I ask that you support Convention of States and consider becoming a co-sponsor. Please respond to my request by informing the national COS team of your position, or sending them any questions you may have: or (540) 441-7227.

Thank you so much for your service to the people of our district.

Respectfully, [Your Name]

By checking this box, you agree to receive text messages sent via an “autodialer”. Our text messages are intended to inform you of events, calls to action, volunteering opportunities, and other matters pertaining to self-governance. Text STOP to stop receiving messages. Text HELP for more info. Message frequency varies. Message and data rates may apply. View Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Provide your full address and we will deliver your petition directly to your state legislators now and again during the legislative sessions, Free of Charge. We Protect your privacy.

We welcome all US citizens to support our movement by signing the petition. To deliver the petition to your state legislators, you must enter your full address, which must be within one of the 50 states. For military personnel serving overseas, or for expatriates, enter your Voting Residence Address .

Please be sure to check the "Send me email updates" box, and include your phone number above.

How did you hear about us:

Click here to get involved!
Convention of states action

Are you sure you don't want emailed updates on our progress and local events? We respect your privacy, but we don't want you to feel left out!