This website uses cookies to improve your experience.

Please enable cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website

Sign the petition

to call for a

Convention of States!

signatures
Columns Default Settings

Case for Amending U.S. Constitution: Federal Budget Timeline 

Written by Mr. Michael D. Forbis 

June 30, 2023 

Overview. This short paper attempts to provide a simple and objective explanation for the basis of adding an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that addresses the need to have an established Federal Budget Timeline. The goal is for it to serve as a reference to inform the discussion on this potential amendment.

The federal government lacks discipline to pass a timely federal budget each fiscal year, and an amendment to the U.S. Constitution is necessary to rectify this situation. The potential amendment can simply be written in the following manner. 

  • Section 1: The fiscal year begins on October 1st of a given year, and it concludes on September 30th of the following year. 
  • Section 2: The annual budget process begins with Congress, and a complete fiscal year budget consists of a full resolution with all applicable appropriations. Congress shall adopt a complete fiscal year budget no later than the first Monday in May for the following fiscal year, and it shall submit the budget to the President for consideration. 
  • Section 3: If Congress fails to adopt a complete fiscal year budget and the President fails to sign the budget into law prior to the start of a new fiscal year, then the previous fiscal year’s budget conditions automatically continue into the new fiscal year. On October 1, Congress shall assemble and remain in session until adopting a complete fiscal year budget and signed into law by the President. No other form of legislation will be permitted until after a complete fiscal year budget becomes law. 
  • Section 4: This amendment shall take effect in the third fiscal year after its ratification. 

In Article I of the U.S. Constitution, there are certain fiscal powers granted to Congress, and these fiscal powers also have inherent responsibilities that accompany them. Congress has both the power of the purse and responsibility for the financial discipline of the United States. Below are the two core statements that explain these powers and inherent responsibilities, and they are critical to establishing a complete fiscal year budget. 

  • Section 8 states the “Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States. To borrow Money on the credit of the United States.” 
  • Section 9 states “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in the Consequences of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.”
  • The U.S. Constitution does not specify a budget process and timeline. 

Beginning in the early 1920s, Congress realized it lacked the institutional capacity to create, coordinate, and enforce budgetary requirements for the United States, and it could not fulfill its Constitutional responsibilities. As a result, the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921 was established and gave the President overall budget planning responsibility that required the executive branch to submit an annual budget to Congress for approval. In this instance, the U.S. Congress delegated its responsibility for establishing a federal budget to the President.1 

Gradually over time, the 1921 law became an issue, and Congress had to reclaim back some of its Constitutional powers. Thus, the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act (ICA) of 1974 became law that established procedures and a timeline for the creation of a federal budget. The ICA also created the House and Senate Budget Committees and Congressional Budget Office (CBO), and this helped address the lack of institutional capacity experienced by Congress in the early 1920s.2 In the ICA, the President initiates the annual budget process by submitting it to Congress on the first Monday in February. Both chambers of Congress review the President’s budget and complete concurrent resolutions on the budget by mid-April. Finally, Congress completes all appropriations for the budget by end of June for it to become effective by October 1 (start of the fiscal year).3 After the ICA became law in 1974, the standard fiscal year (FY) was set from October 1 through September 30 starting with FY1977, and this standard timeframe has been the norm for the last 47 years.4 

Since the ICA has been in effect, Congress and the President passed a complete fiscal year budget with full resolutions and all appropriations before October 1 in only three fiscal years (1989,1995&1997). In other words, the federal government met the budget process and timeline described in the ICA in 3 of 47 years (or 6.3% of the time).5 For the other 44 years, Congress has adopted a practice of passing one or more continuing resolutions (CR) in the absence of a federal budget to avoid government shutdowns or gaps in funding. Even with this practice, there has not been a consistent timeframe for the duration of CRs before establishing a federal budget. Table 1 below depicts FY2000-2022 and the duration of their respective CR(s) before establishing a federal budget. In some cases, the CR existed for the entire FY without a new federal budget (i.e., 2007, 2011&2013).6 

FY Days FY Days FY Days FY Days
2000 60 2006 91 2012 84 2018 174
2001 82 2007 365 2013 365 2019 138
2002 102 2008 87 2014 109 2020 81
2003 143 2009 162 2015 155 2021 88
2004 115 2010 80 2016 79 2022 166
2005 69 2011 365 2017 217 Average: 147 days

Table 1: Fiscal Years (FY) 2000-2022 and time duration of CRs

Over the course of the last 100+ years, the U.S. Congress has not fulfilled its inherent responsibility to lead the federal budget process for the United States, and it delegated this responsibility to the President. In addition, there has not been a consistent federal budget timeline that provided predictability and certainty, and a 6.3% success rate for passing a complete fiscal year budget on time is a very poor record. As seen in the examples of budgets for FY2000-2022, the federal government demonstrated even further unpredictability and uncertainty through the inconsistent time durations of CRs. Overall, this historical record is both unconstitutional and undisciplined. 

The proposed Federal Budget Timeline amendment resolves multiple issues identified within this poor historical record. First, it clearly defines the fiscal year timeframe, and it prevents Congress and the President from attempting to change it with legislation. Second, it holds Congress accountable for its inherent Constitutional responsibility for initiating the budget process, and it clearly defines a complete fiscal year budget. Third, the amendment eliminates the need for passing CRs if a complete fiscal year budget is not signed into law on time, and it describes the consequence for not finishing it and the solution to rectify it. The end result will be an improved and more disciplined Federal Budget Timeline that provides more predictability and certainty. 

Finally, this Federal Budget Timeline amendment adds to the overall need to have a balanced budget that imposes fiscal restraints on the federal government. To accomplish this overall need, it is necessary to have other amendments that address “spending” and “taxation.” The combination of these three different amendments ensures a federal balanced budget. However, there is no guarantee all three amendments will become part of the U.S. Constitution. It is possible for this Federal Budget Timeline amendment to be adopted without the other two amendments, and this potential result is still better than the status quo. Therefore, the introduction of three distinct but related amendments ensures a greater probability of success to improve the overall federal budget than if all three were compiled into one master amendment.

Back to Case Papers

Back to Home Base

Footnotes:

1 See https://www.cbo.gov/history. The history of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) originated from a need for the U.S. Congress to expand its staffing capability that it did not have as an institution.

2 See https://democrats-budget.hous.gov/resources/reports/ for additional background for creation of ICA. 

3 The Congressional Budget Process Timeline, September 7, 2022. Congressional Research Service (CRS) report R47235, p2. See https://crsreports.congress.gov 

4 CRS Report R47235, p7. 

5 CRS Report R47235, p7. 

6 CRS Report R47235, p8. 

Click here to get involved!

Physicians for COS

The diagnosis is clear.

We have a growing cancer today known as the Obamacare. As a result physicians are no longer free to practice medicine.

No profession feels the full force of the federal government more than physicians. The medical profession is the most highly regulated profession in the United States. The practice of medicine is controlled, taxed, and regulated to the point of being destroyed by the heavy hand of the federal government.

Physicians are told how to bill, how much to charge, and how to treat patients. They are mandated to use expensive electronic medical records. The federally enacted HIPPA (Health Information Privacy and Portability Act) makes the communication between physicians and atients burdensome, inefficient,and expensive. Every physician is required by federal mandate to register with the government to obtain an NPI (national provider identifier.) We are required by federal law to obtain and pay for a license to prescribe medication through the DEA, which is separate from our state licensure.

This heavy hand of government not only oversees the largest federal health bureaucracy ever created, but by extension reaches into every state, every city, and every small town to regulate how every licensed physician practices the art of medicine and how citizens obtain care.

The treatment is also clear.

The prescription for a cure was written into our constitution by our founders. Article V of our constitution allows for the states to call for a convention of states to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government through the proposal of constitutional amendments. Physicians should be the strongest supporters of this brilliantly-crafted states’ rights tool placed into our constitution by our founders.

I urge my fellow American physicians to join with me in supporting an Article V Convention of States to take back control of the practice of medicine. It’s the only way that we can return the practice of medicine back to the intimate relationship between a doctor and patient without interference by the heavy hand of a distant, national government.

Jeffrey I. Barke, M.D. Family Physician Newport Beach, CA
Convention of states action

Are you sure you don't want emailed updates on our progress and local events? We respect your privacy, but we don't want you to feel left out!

Processing...