This website uses cookies to improve your experience.

Please enable cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website

Sign the petition

to call for a

Convention of States!

signatures
Columns Default Settings

Pennsylvania Voter Attitude Survey Conducted January 15-21, 2024

 

 

 

 Top Line Survey Results Convention of States Action

2225 Sycamore Street
Harrisburg, PA 17111
Phone: (717) 233-8850
Email: james@susquehannapolling.com www.susquehannapolling.com

 

Pennsylvania Voter Attitude Survey Conducted January 15-21, 2024 Sample Size: 800 Likely Voters
 

TOP LINE RESULTS AND QUESTIONNAIRE                       CONVENTION OF STATES ACTION

Good morning/afternoon/evening, my name is (YOUR FIRST NAME). I am calling on behalf of Susquehanna Polling and Research, a public opinion research firm. May I speak to (name on list) or another registered voter in your household? (If name on list or another registered voter is not available, TERMINATE)

INTRODUCTION: We are conducting a survey of attitudes and opinions concerning some important issues facing Pennsylvania today. May we have just two to three minutes of your time to complete a brief survey?

Great, thank you…

Q1. Do you think politicians and bureaucrats in Washington, D.C. should have term limits?

1.   Yes                    717            90%

2.   No                     48              06%

3.   Not Sure           34              04

 

Q2. Are you concerned about our $34 Trillion national debt? (Test Intensity…)

1.    Yes, very concerned                           421               53%

2.    Yes, somewhat concerned                  280               35%

       Yes, Total Very/Somewhat:                  701               88%

3.    No, not very concerned                        65                08%

4.    No, Not at all concerned                       26                03%

       No, Total Not Very/Not at All:                91                11%

5.    Not Sure                                                 8                 01%

 

Q3. Do you prefer for the policies that govern you to be made in Washington, D.C. or in Pennsylvania?

1.    Washington, D.C.                       56                07%

2.   Pennsylvania                             377                47%

3.    Neither (DNR)                             26               03%

4.    Both (DNR)                               163               20%

5.    Not sure/depends (DNR)          176               22%

6.   Refuse                                            2              00%

 

Q4. Would you support or oppose a Convention of States to meet and propose constitutional amendments focusing on term limits for Congress and bureaucrats, federal spending restraints, and limiting the federal government to its constitutionally mandated authority?

1.   Yes/support              539                 67%        PROCEED TO Q5

2.   No/oppose               114                 14%        SKIP TO Q6

3.    Not Sure                 142                  18%       SKIP TO Q6

4.   Refuse                         5                   01%      SKIP TO Q6

 

Q5. Would you be willing to vote for a candidate of a different party who supports holding a convention to propose amendments that would stop abuses of power by the federal government?   (N=539)

1.   Yes                  377              70%

2.   No                     59              11%

3.   Not Sure         103               19%

 

Q6. Please indicate the political party with which you are registered to vote.

1. Republican                            336               42%

2. Democrat                              352               44%

3. Independent/other                  97                12%

4. Not Sure                                   8                 01%

5. Refuse                                      7                 01%

 

Q7. Please indicate your age on your last birthday.

1. 18-29            64             08%

2. 30-44          160             20%

3. 45-54          144             18%

4. 55-64          184             23%

5. 65-74          176             22%

6. 75+               72             09%

 

 Q8. Please indicate your main racial or ethnic background.  (Check All That Apply)

1.    African American/African/Black             51                   06%

2.    Asian American/Asian                           20                   03%

3.   Hispanic/Latino                                       35                   04%

4.   Multiracial/Multiethnic                               8                    01%

5.    Native American/Alaska Native               7                    01%

6.    Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander             0                    00%

7.    White (Not Latino/Hispanic)                 653                    82%

8.    Race/ethnicity not represented              17                    02%

9.    Refuse (Do Not Read)                            28                    04%

 

Q9. Please indicate your gender.

1. Male            400           50%

2. Female       400           50%

 

Regional Groupings (coded from list):

56       (07%)       1. Northwest [Erie, Crawford, Mercer, Venango, Warren, Forest]

96       (12%)       2. Southwest [Lawrence, Beaver, Washington, Greene, Fayette, Westmoreland, Indiana, Armstrong, Butler]

112    (14%)         3. The “T”/Central [Jefferson, Elk, McKean, Cameron, Clarion, Clearfield, Centre, Cambria,

Somerset, Bedford, Fulton, Franklin, Huntingdon, Blair, Potter, Tioga, Bradford, Susquehanna, Wyoming, Sullivan, Lycoming, Clinton, Union, Snyder, Northumberland, Montour, Columbia, Mifflin]

112   (14%)        4. Northeast/Lehigh Valley [Luzerne, Carbon, Monroe, Schuylkill, Lackawanna, Lehigh, Northampton, Pike, Wayne]

128      (16%)      5. South Central [Perry, Cumberland, Adams, York, Lancaster, Lebanon, Dauphin, Berks, Juniata]

144      (18%)      6. Southeast [Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Bucks]

72        (09%)      7. Allegheny County

80        (10%)      8. Philadelphia

 

This poll was conducted by Susquehanna Polling and Research, Inc1, with questions sponsored by Convention of States Action. Interviews were conducted January 15-21, 2024, with 800 registered/likely voters in Pennsylvania. Survey respondents are randomly contacted using random selection procedures, and all telephone interviews are conducted using live telephone agents. The sample frame was compiled using random telephone sequence methods, and includes both landline and cellular households, purchased from a certified list vendor; all households are pre-screened to eliminate household telephone numbers on the federal Do Not Call registry in compliance with all applicable federal and state laws. Only known registered voters were contacted, compiled from a list of households with prior vote history in 1 of 4 or better general elections using G22, G21, G20 and/or G19 as the base universe.  Voters who registered to vote after the 2022 general election are also included and eligible to participate.

Interviews are closely monitored to ensure a representative sample of the Pennsylvania electorate is achieved based on party registration, geography, gender, age cohort and other demographics; results are sometimes statistically weighted to adjust for coverage bias or non-response error.

A supplemental component of interviews was collected via SP&R’s proprietary web panel, owned by Bartlett Research Group, consisting of a database of registered voters in all geographic regions of the Commonwealth. Panel respondents are pre-screened to ensure their eligibility in the survey.

The margin of error for a sample size of 800 interviews is +/-3.4% at the 95% confidence level.

1 Susquehanna Polling and Research, Inc. is a nationally recognized polling and focus group company and conducts polling for political, media and corporate clients in numerous states. SP&R’s polling has been featured on many national platforms, including the Rush Limbaugh Radio Show, FOX News Channel, The O’Reilly Factor, the Bill Maher Show and MSNBC. The website realclearpolitics.com rated SP&R the #1 most accurate pollster in the USA for its battleground polling in the “multi state” category in the lead up to the 2020 POTUS national elections.

Click here to get involved!

Physicians for COS

The diagnosis is clear.

We have a growing cancer today known as the Obamacare. As a result physicians are no longer free to practice medicine.

No profession feels the full force of the federal government more than physicians. The medical profession is the most highly regulated profession in the United States. The practice of medicine is controlled, taxed, and regulated to the point of being destroyed by the heavy hand of the federal government.

Physicians are told how to bill, how much to charge, and how to treat patients. They are mandated to use expensive electronic medical records. The federally enacted HIPPA (Health Information Privacy and Portability Act) makes the communication between physicians and atients burdensome, inefficient,and expensive. Every physician is required by federal mandate to register with the government to obtain an NPI (national provider identifier.) We are required by federal law to obtain and pay for a license to prescribe medication through the DEA, which is separate from our state licensure.

This heavy hand of government not only oversees the largest federal health bureaucracy ever created, but by extension reaches into every state, every city, and every small town to regulate how every licensed physician practices the art of medicine and how citizens obtain care.

The treatment is also clear.

The prescription for a cure was written into our constitution by our founders. Article V of our constitution allows for the states to call for a convention of states to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government through the proposal of constitutional amendments. Physicians should be the strongest supporters of this brilliantly-crafted states’ rights tool placed into our constitution by our founders.

I urge my fellow American physicians to join with me in supporting an Article V Convention of States to take back control of the practice of medicine. It’s the only way that we can return the practice of medicine back to the intimate relationship between a doctor and patient without interference by the heavy hand of a distant, national government.

Jeffrey I. Barke, M.D. Family Physician Newport Beach, CA
Convention of states action

Are you sure you don't want emailed updates on our progress and local events? We respect your privacy, but we don't want you to feel left out!

Processing...