As a result of the horrific experiments conducted by the Nazis during WWII, the Nuremberg Code was drafted as a set of research principles guiding human experimentation.
The essence of the code is that “voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.” This means that the individuals involved must have full understanding of the risks, be capable of giving consent, and be free to make that decision for themselves. They cannot be subjected to “any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.”
Today our federal government is attempting to force citizens of the United States to take part in a massive medical experiment. We are told that it is our civic duty to protect others and that the so called “vaccines” are safe and effective. But are they?
On August 23, 2021, the FDA granted permanent approval for Pfizer’s Comirnaty jab. The Pentagon immediately mandated “vaccines” for all military personnel – take the jab or lose your job. But was that action legal?
The approved and licensed Pfizer’s Comirnaty is not available in the United States. We are still using Pfizer-BioNTech. The FDA states Comirnaty and Pfizer-BioNTech are “legally distinct” but that their differences do not “impact safety or effectiveness.” Pfizer-BioNTech is still under Emergency Use Authorization – thus the military is being forced into an experimental human trial in direct violation of the Nuremberg Code.
You have to wonder why the United States isn’t using the new and “approved” formula. Could it be that Pfizer loses the blanket immunity from lawsuits granted by Emergency Use Authorization?
We are being asked to trust Pfizer. But are they worthy of our trust? Is the FDA? When Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT), a group of more than 30 medical and public health professionals and scientists from institutions such as Harvard, Yale and UCLA, filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request asking the FDA to release “all data and information for the Pfizer vaccine, including safety and effectiveness data, adverse reaction reports, and a list of active and inactive ingredients,” the FDA resisted. They claimed they needed 75 years to release the safety data.
Judge Mark Pittman of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, issued an order “requiring the FDA to release 12,000 pages of documents by January 31, 2022 and an additional 55,000 pages per month thereafter, until the release of the nearly 400,000 pages of documents is complete.” However, just days before the scheduled release of the first tranche of documents, Pfizer asked the court to allow them to intervene.
They needed Pfizer’s help to protect “proprietary” information. An original batch of 500 pages released in November 2021, “revealed there were more than 1,200 vaccine-related deaths within the first 90 days following the release of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine.” What are they hiding?
It’s not like Pfizer hasn’t played dirty in the past. Pfizer, represented by DLA Piper LLP, one of the world’s most high-powered law firms, was convicted of criminal behavior. They pled guilty to a felony violation for promoting off-label uses of Bextra. As part of the settlement, according to the Justice Department, “Pfizer will pay a criminal fine of $1.195 billion, the largest criminal fine ever imposed in the USA for any matter.” Pharmacia & Upjohn, Pfizer’s parent company, will pay a $105 million criminal fine. Pfizer also agreed to pay “$1 billion in civil damages and penalties to compensate federal health-care programs for false claims submitted as a result of its marketing of Bextra and four other drugs for off-label use or at unapproved dosages.
In April 2005, Bextra was pulled off the market (at the FDA’s request) “because its risks, including a rare, sometimes fatal, skin reaction.”
But Pfizer isn’t the only “vaccine” manufacture found guilty of criminal behavior. In 2013, Johnson & Johnson’s criminal fines and forfeiture totaled $485 million, with an additional $1.7 billion in civil settlements for false marketing of its Risperdal, a drug approved to treat schizophrenia.
In addition, Johnson and Johnson is implicated in the national opioid crisis. Attorneys argue that the company “created a false narrative of widespread untreated pain, and determined opioids were the solution, in part by funding organizations like the American Pain Society.”
Johnson and Johnson’s troubles don’t stop there. They are also facing large billion-dollar verdicts and settlements involving their baby powder and talc which contains asbestos. In an unethical attempt to protect their “vaccine” profits, Johnson & Johnson shifted all of their talc liabilities into the newly created corporation, LTL Management, which promptly filed for bankruptcy protection, placing their talcum powder lawsuits on hold and moving the litigation into bankruptcy court.
Moderna, Inc. is new to the vaccine game. The company has never brought a medicine of any kind to the market and the approach they used to develop their “vaccine” has never been successfully used in humans. They are currently in a patent dispute with Arbutus Biopharma Corp, the holder of the original patents on the mRNA delivery system. The Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals “let stand an administrative panel’s findings that Arbutus’ patents – which may cover technology used in the vaccines – are valid, as the science involved was not previously known.”
Guess they didn’t want to share their “profits” with the original patent holders. Go figure.
Just this past week the FDA approved Moderna’s Spikevax, which, according to the FDA, is “legally distinct” but “has the same formulation as the EUA Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine and…can be used interchangeably with the EUA Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine to provide the COVID-19 vaccination series.” And just like Pfizer’s Comirnaty, it is unavailable in the United States.
The jab being administered is the fully indemnified Emergency Use Authorization shot. It is interesting to note that the FDA approved Spikevax without convening their expert vaccine advisory panel.
According to the Facts Matter segment aired on February 3, 2022, “The Epoch Times found a fascinating document on the FDA’s website. That document explained the FDA’s rationale for authorizing the Moderna vaccine – and within the body of that document, they mentioned that the instance of myocarditis was significantly higher than previously reported.” However, when the Epoch Times reached out to the FDA for comment, instead of commenting, they just deleted the document from their website. Why?
The Nuremberg Code states: “During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment require of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.”
Data collected from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) released by the CDC on February 4, 2022, showed a total of 1,088,560 adverse events following COVID vaccines between Dec. 14, 2020 and Jan. 28, 2022. There were a total 183,311 reports of serious injuries, including 23,149 deaths. It is understood that VAERS under reports adverse events and deaths somewhere between 40 and 90 percent. It seems like “probable cause” under the Nuremberg Code to terminate the experiment.
On January 24, 2022, Senator Ron Johnson moderated a panel discussion, COVID-19: A Second Opinion. The panel included a group of world renowned doctors and medical experts. The discussion covered “the global pandemic response, the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term.”
Thomas Renz, an attorney representing three whistleblowers from the military, testified that the Defense Medical Surveillance System (DMSS) showed a recent spike in military vaccine illnesses. The Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) is the premier database in the world of analyzing what’s going on with health trends and epidemiology, and it focuses on our soldiers. So all the data that’s in there comes through a system called DMSS…and that’s medical records for all our soldiers.”
Taxpayers pay millions of dollars per year to make sure that its strong, solid data. Unlike VAERS, only DOD personal and medical providers can input data into the system.
According to DMSS, between January and November 2021, adverse events in military personnel rose at alarming rates: heart attacks by 269%, pericarditis by 175%, myocarditis by 285%, pulmonary embolisms by 467%, cerebral Infarction by 393%, Bell’s Palsy by 319%, Guillain-Barre Syndrome by 250%, Immunodeficiency by 275%, ITP (Immune thrombocytopenia) by 322%, Menstrual Irregularity by 476%, MS/Demyelinating Disease by 487%, Neoplasms (abnormal new growth of tissue) by 296% and Spontaneous abortions by 306%. The Department of Defense reports that the recent spikes are due to a system glitch.
The rights protected by the Constitution of the United States are given to us by God – not by government. Our Founders made sure our founding documents protected us from tyranny. Even if the so called “vaccines” worked, our politicians do not have the right to force us into a medical experiment. It is time to put a stop to out of control federal government overreach. The Convention of States is our only hope to return power to the people. Please join us in a grassroots movement to limit the power, scope and reach of those who are abusing our country.
Talcum Powder – Johnson & Johnson tries to avoid liability in talcum powder lawsuits - Gage Mathers - Personal Injury Lawyer Phoenix AZ
Pfizer, FDA Ask Court to Further Delay Release of COVID Vaccine Safety Data • Children's Health Defense (childrenshealthdefense.org)
‘Paramount importance’: Judge orders FDA to hasten release of Pfizer vaccine docs | Reuters
Pfizer fined $2.3 billion for illegal marketing in off-label drug case - ABC News (go.com)
Big Pharma Lawsuits & Consumer Drug Injury Settlements (thelyonfirm.com)
Top 10 Largest Pharmaceutical Lawsuits & Settlement Amounts (enjuris.com)
The Nuremberg Code (cirp.org)
Did the FDA Pull a Bait-and-Switch on the American People? | Education News (educationviews.org)
FDA Grants Full Approval of Moderna’s Spikevax COVID Vaccine — Another ‘Bait-and-Switch?’ « Aletho News
The FDA did NOT grant full approval to the Pfizer shots - American Thinker
Moderna in Trouble - ABUS Wins Lawsuit Tied to COVID-19 Drug for NASDAQ:ABUS by HotCharts — TradingView
3 Red Flags for Moderna's Potential Coronavirus Vaccine | The Motley Fool
Facts Matter (Feb. 3): FDA Suddenly Removes Data on Moderna Vaccine Approval Which Showed 2.6x Heart Inflammation (theepochtimes.com)
Defense Health Agency Data Leak Shows Massive Spike in Covid-19 Vaccine Related Injuries Among DoD Personnel. - Truth for Health Foundation
DOD Claims “Glitch in Database” After Attorney Exposes Skyrocketing Military Vaccine Injuries – NewsWars
Moderna could be sued over vaccines as court upholds Arbutus patents | Reuters
CDC Panel Backs Moderna ‘Spikevax’ for 18 and Older, as COVID Vaccine Injuries Continue to Rise, VAERS Data Show • Children's Health Defense (childrenshealthdefense.org)
