This website uses cookies to improve your experience.

Please enable cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website

lock checkmark empty_photo_icon facebook twitter youtube LinkedIn Instagram Big play Menu Video play Arrow down Arrow up Arrow right Arrow left Search Close File Network PDF Image Video

State Department uses misleading statistics in an attempt to make the UN seem less anti-Israel

Published in Blog on July 18, 2017 by Convention Of States Project

2040 original

The State Department is using misleading statistics to make the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) seem less anti-Israel than it truly is, according to a leading watchdog of the international body.

The HRC was put under the microscope this week on Capitol Hill during a Human Rights Commission hearing that examined its first 10 years of existence, which has been marred by anti-Israel bias and membership by some of the world’s worst human rights abusers.

The HRC was founded in 2006, but the Bush administration withdrew from the body in hopes of starving it of legitimacy. That policy was reversed by the Obama administration in 2009. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced that the administration “believed [it] could make a difference by working with [the council] on the inside rather than standing on the outside merely as a critic.”

Seven years later, the State Department is trying to prove that the 2009 decision has improved the council and made it less anti-Israel.

While acknowledging that the council remains an “imperfect body” with a “strong bias against Israel,” the State Department’s Erin Barclay testified to Congress that the hyper-focus on Israel has greatly decreased since 2009.

“Prior to our joining the HRC, over one-half of all country-specific resolutions the council adopted concerned Israel,” Barclay said. “Today, about one-fifth of the HRC’s country resolutions deal with the Palestinian territories.”

Hillel Neuer, the executive director of U.N. Watch, testified after Barclay and said that the statistic she used was “entirely inconsistent” with numbers calculated by his group.

“We heard the number in the first panel that one-fifth of the resolutions deal with Israel,” Neuer said. “These are entirely inconsistent with the numbers that we count quite scrupulously.”

“The State Department seems to be counting all country resolutions and that is not a meaningful metric,” Neuer said. “When we count we look at condemnations—how many condemnations of Israel versus condemnations of other countries.”

Click here to read more from the Washington Free Beacon.

Once again, D.C. puts politics over the truth, and only one thing can fix the mess in our nation's capital: an Article V Convention of States. A Convention of States can propose constitutional amendments that remind the feds of their responsibility to tell the truth to the American people.


Click here to get involved!
1 big

Convention Of States Project

Thank-you for your interest in the Convention of States Project -- You have joined more than 3 million other patriotic Americans in the movement to preserve and protect the vision of our founders.