This website uses cookies to improve your experience.

Please enable cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website

lock checkmark empty_photo_icon facebook twitter youtube LinkedIn Instagram Big play Menu Video play Arrow down Arrow up Arrow right Arrow left Search Close File Network PDF Image Video

Federal overreach silences dissenting opinion

Published in Blog on July 18, 2017 by Convention Of States Project

2110 original

The Washington Post covered a study yesterday that suggests some alarming effects of government overreach.

A new study shows that knowledge of government surveillance causes people to self-censor their dissenting opinions online. The research offers a sobering look at the oft-touted "democratizing" effect of social media and Internet access that bolsters minority opinion.

The study, published in Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, studied the effects of subtle reminders of mass surveillance on its subjects. The majority of participants reacted by suppressing opinions that they perceived to be in the minority. This research illustrates the silencing effect of participants’ dissenting opinions in the wake of widespread knowledge of government surveillance, as revealed by whistleblower Edward Snowden in 2013.

The “spiral of silence” is a well-researched phenomenon in which people suppress unpopular opinions to fit in and avoid social isolation. It has been looked at in the context of social media and the echo-chamber effect, in which we tailor our opinions to fit the online activity of our Facebook and Twitter friends. But this study adds a new layer by explicitly examining how government surveillance affects self-censorship.

This is one of the byproducts of an out-of-control, centralized government. The NSA collects phone/internet data from American citizens, so people are less likely to express themselves. The IRS targets people of certain political persuasions, so citizens are less likely to participate in the political process. Even if it doesn't seem like a direct threat, the effect of big government is one of intimidation and oppression.

Fortunately, a Convention of States can shrink the federal government--both in terms of its size and its power. Click here to learn how.


Click here to get involved!
1 big

Convention Of States Project

Thank-you for your interest in the Convention of States Project -- You have joined more than 3 million other patriotic Americans in the movement to preserve and protect the vision of our founders.