Watch Michael Farris and OK Senator Rob Standridge square off against leaders of the Oklahoma John Birch Society in the definitive Convention of States debate. 0:05 Introductions 7:25 Pro Opening Statement 17:45 Con Opening Statement 28:30 Cross-Examination - Why not use the 9th and 10th Amendments? 33:20 Could this affect state budgets? 35:00 Could courts override new amendments? 37:20 Could Congress take advantage of obscure language in a balanced budget amendment? 39:00 Do opponents prefer secession over Article V process? 43:00 What is the nullification process? What recourse do states have against repercussions of nullification? 46:00 Did the states call for the Philadelphia Convention? 49:30 Audience Question: How does the depravity of man play into this debate? 53:30 Audience Question: When can Convention of States bear fruit? 59:15 Audience Question: A new Constitution? 1:04:55 Audience Question: Could Washington D.C. ignore news amendments? 1:09:15 Audience Question: What 3 things would you change in the Constitution? 1:14:00 Audience Question: What if leftists do it first? 1:20:00 Audience Question: Are Article V advocates working to kill nullification efforts? 1:26:15 Rebuttal Speeches 1:35:00 Closing Remarks
Michael Farris Debates Leaders of John Birch Society in Oklahoma
Published in Uncategorized on July 17, 2017 by Convention Of States Project