This website uses cookies to improve your experience.

Please enable cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website

Sign the petition

to call for a

Convention of States!

signatures

Over 75% Oppose Protests at Private Homes of Supreme Court Justices


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: press@gideon300.com 
323-538-2130

Over 75% Oppose Protests at Private Homes of Supreme Court Justices  


Majority Also Say Biden’s Failure to Condemn Illegal Protests at Homes of Court Justices Will Potentially Encourage Violence

(Austin, TX—May 10, 2022) Convention of States Action, in partnership with The Trafalgar Group—one of America’s most accurate pollsters in 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2021—is releasing the results of a new national survey. Results were from surveys conducted May 6th through May 8th of over 1,000 likely 2022 election voters.

“These numbers make it clear that the Biden Administration’s refusal—both to forcefully condemn these illegal demonstrations and to enforce laws protecting Justices of the United States Supreme Court—is wildly unpopular with voters,” said Mark Meckler, President of Convention of States Action. “While this poll cannot measure the outrage that Americans feel because of this politically-driven double standard of injustice, in which supporters of a radical leftist agenda can essentially do whatever they want while good citizens suffer, voters’ outrage will be expressed at the polls in November. From the riots in our cities they encouraged and supported, to refusing to condemn protesting at the private homes of Justices of the United States Supreme Court, Democrats are out of step with the vast majority of Americans, regardless of political party.”

For complete details on the poll, including graphics, please visit: https://www.thetrafalgargroup.org/news/nat-issues-scotus-0510

KEY INSIGHT: 76 Percent of Voters Believe Publishing the Home Address of Supreme Court Justices and Protesting at Their Private Residences is Not an Acceptable Way to Protest Supreme Court’s Upcoming Roe v. Wade Decision:

75.8 of American voters believe that publishing the home address of 5 conservative U.S. Supreme Court Justices and calling for protests at their homes is not an acceptable way to protest the High Court’s decision on Roe v. Wade.

15.9 percent of American voters believe that publishing the home address of 5 conservative U.S. Supreme Court Justices and calling for protests at their homes is an acceptable way to protest the High Court’s decision on Roe v. Wade.

8.3 percent are unsure

KEY INSIGHT: Bi-Partisan Majority Opposes Publishing Home Addresses of Supreme Court Justices and Protesting at Their Homes:   

75.1 percent of Independents believe that publishing the home address of 5 conservative U.S. Supreme Court Justices and calling for protests at their homes is not an acceptable way to protest the High Court’s decision on Roe v. Wade. 18.5 percent say it is acceptable and 6.5 percent are unsure.

66.6 percent of Democrats believe that publishing the home address of 5 conservative U.S. Supreme Court Justices and calling for protests at their homes is not an acceptable way to protest the High Court’s decision on Roe v. Wade. 21.4 percent say it is acceptable and 12 percent are unsure. 

86.5 percent of Republicans believe that publishing the home address of 5 conservative U.S. Supreme Court Justices and calling for protests at their homes is not an acceptable way to protest the High Court’s decision on Roe v. Wade. 7.9 percent say it is acceptable and 5.7 percent are unsure.

KEY INSIGHT: Majority of Voters Believe That President Biden’s Refusal to Publicly Condemn Abortion Activists Publishing Home Addresses of Supreme Court Justices and Calling for Protests at Their Homes Will Encourage Protests to Potentially Become Violent or Unlawful:

52.3 percent of American voters believe that the Biden Administration’s refusal to condemn abortion activists publishing the home address of U.S. Supreme Court Justices and calling for protests at their homes will encourage protests to become potentially unlawful or violent.

27.5 percent of American voters believe that the Biden Administration’s refusal to condemn abortion activists publishing the home address of U.S. Supreme Court Justices and calling for protests at their homes will not have an impact on protests.

10 percent of American voters believe that the Biden Administration’s refusal to condemn abortion activists publishing the home address of U.S. Supreme Court Justices and calling for protests at their homes will discourage protests from becoming potentially unlawful or violent.

10.2 percent are unsure.

###

About Convention of States Action—Boasting a grassroots network of over 5 million supporters and volunteers, Convention of States’ mission is to restore a culture of self-governance in America and to curtail federal overreach. Its primary focus in accomplishing this mission is using a limited Article V Convention to propose constitutional amendments that impose limitations on the size and scope of the federal government, including a balanced budget requirement and term limits for federal officials.

Click here to get involved!

Physicians for COS

The diagnosis is clear.

We have a growing cancer today known as the Obamacare. As a result physicians are no longer free to practice medicine.

No profession feels the full force of the federal government more than physicians. The medical profession is the most highly regulated profession in the United States. The practice of medicine is controlled, taxed, and regulated to the point of being destroyed by the heavy hand of the federal government.

Physicians are told how to bill, how much to charge, and how to treat patients. They are mandated to use expensive electronic medical records. The federally enacted HIPPA (Health Information Privacy and Portability Act) makes the communication between physicians and atients burdensome, inefficient,and expensive. Every physician is required by federal mandate to register with the government to obtain an NPI (national provider identifier.) We are required by federal law to obtain and pay for a license to prescribe medication through the DEA, which is separate from our state licensure.

This heavy hand of government not only oversees the largest federal health bureaucracy ever created, but by extension reaches into every state, every city, and every small town to regulate how every licensed physician practices the art of medicine and how citizens obtain care.

The treatment is also clear.

The prescription for a cure was written into our constitution by our founders. Article V of our constitution allows for the states to call for a convention of states to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government through the proposal of constitutional amendments. Physicians should be the strongest supporters of this brilliantly-crafted states’ rights tool placed into our constitution by our founders.

I urge my fellow American physicians to join with me in supporting an Article V Convention of States to take back control of the practice of medicine. It’s the only way that we can return the practice of medicine back to the intimate relationship between a doctor and patient without interference by the heavy hand of a distant, national government.

Jeffrey I. Barke, M.D. Family Physician Newport Beach, CA
Convention of states action

Are you sure you don't want emailed updates on our progress and local events? We respect your privacy, but we don't want you to feel left out!

Processing...