Remember the 1960’s crime show, “The FBI,” starring Ephraim Zimbalist, Jr? Those were the days!
(See this article from Fox News for examples of the actions of the FBI today.)
Visibly Shaken
On Feb. 4 Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) interrogated some Twitter execs at a hearing of the House Oversight Committee. She was well prepared and took no quarter. Two of the Twitterites in this video, Vijaya Gadde and Yoel Roth, were visibly shaken by Mrs. Boebert’s inquiries.
From RawStory:
"Did either of you approve the shadow-banning of my account?" Boebert asked former Twitter employees Vijaya Gadde and Yoel Roth.
Both witnesses said they had not approved restrictions on the lawmaker's personal Twitter account, but she was not satisfied.
"I know you looked at it because fascist Twitter 1.0 had a public interest exceptions policy, which means for members of Congress to be shadow-banned, it had to go before you, Mr. Roth," she asserted. "So, I'll ask again. Did you shadow-ban my account?"
"Again, not to the best of my recollection," Roth replied.
"So the answer, Mr. Roth, is yes, you did," Boebert announced before claiming that Twitter had shadow-banned her over a joke about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
You have to watch the video linked above to enjoy their anguish fully. I’m no body language expert but these people had better find good, cheap attorneys (ha ha) because what I saw made me glad that I was not in their shoes.
Rep. Boebert was not only piqued at her own Twitter suspension but brought receipts showing that Twitter was following orders from at least nine employees who were former FBI. These employees regularly informed Twitter of those accounts that needed to be censored for telling the truth or, at worst, providing their owners’ professional opinions regarding things like covid, the election corruption, and so on.
The Ban Hammer
Mrs. Boebert asked Gadde and Roth why they would suspend or ban Harvard and Stanford-educated doctors for merely telling the truth about the covid-19 vaccinations’ inherent mortal dangers. Why were people, including expert physicians and scientists, suspended from Twitter for giving their take on the “pandemic” response? The answer is that the former FBI agents employed at Twitter were wielding the ban hammer.
Please watch the entire video, it’s much more informative and entertaining than I could describe here. You’ll see the involuntary squirming body lingo and the fear of God in their eyes.
People were suspended from Twitter for retweeting Pres. Trump, for posting documents on Twitter from the CDC’s website like vaccine injury data, and so on. Why would the former FBI employed as censors by Twitter fear the dissemination of such info and its documentation? I can read and understand the First Amendment in the Bill of rights, and I don’t see anything about a federal police force in the Constitution, and this is the seed of the problem.
Just the Right Fit
What led Twitter management to believe that nine former FBI agents were just the right fit to monitor political dissidents on Twitter?
What in their backgrounds, except for having been FBI at one time, suited them for this role? Twitter could have hired nine other people with heartbeats and trained them on the enforcement of Twitter’s terms of service. One need not be former FBI to follow such simple instructions, right?
Perhaps these former FBI were able to make quick independent judgments themselves about which Americans’ posts were threats to someone or something these particular FBI are beholden to. I mean, when the pharmaceutical tyranny is threatened by the truth about their dangerous products, its reps must be able to pick up the phone and get something done about it, and they don’t want to talk to some shlub who just got Twitter trained.
Perhaps, again I say perhaps, these former FBI at Twitter were the transmission belt for real-time damage control for the deep state when someone was bold enough for example to retweet Trump. The former FBI at Twitter could be trusted to act for connected people who needed something or someone squelched. If this is the case, one must wonder if these FBI were selected because of their job titles at the Hoover Building. They may have all been in counter-intelligence, who knows?
Did you know that the FBI plans to build a new headquarters twice the size of the Pentagon?
Crime Fighting Innovation of Director Hoover
You may recall that the original FBI Director was J. Edgar Hoover. I won’t make sport of his proclivities here as it would just be low hanging fruit. However, one crime fighting innovation of Director Hoover’s was to suppress any notion among government officials that organized crime was even a thing.
The existence of the worst criminals in the country was pooh-poohed by Hoover, giving the mob decades to perfect its enslavement of people in its gambling, prostitution, and extortion rackets, not to mention murder for hire. So if some mob associate got arrested for loan sharking, there was no effort to see if he was paying up to the local crime boss because there were no crime bosses, you see; at least not insofar as Hoover’s FBI was concerned.
Someone may even reach the conclusion that Hoover was not an independent agent in this regard, but was the transmission belt for orders from people who, you know, wanted things done, including presidents. He may have been willing to use his copious investigative powers to collect embarrassing and damaging information on people trying to clean up the Mafia, or Hollywood, or city hall, then make them an offer they couldn’t refuse involving photographs and so on.
I’m not alone in reaching such conclusions, and if true then this has basically been a service the FBI has provided to “important” people for many years. And remember, Hoover didn’t hoover up all that information about people without using FBI agents.
We shouldn’t be surprised to find former FBI running the censorship department at Twitter or anywhere else. In fact, the former FBI at Twitter had their own group chat called “BU,” for “Bureau.” Maybe these former FBI weren’t so “former” after all, at least not in spirit.
More Consequential Involvement
So watch the video please, if you haven’t already. Keep in mind things like Waco, Ruby Ridge, the OK City Bombing, and January 6 as you watch. These Twitter employees realize that they should not have been colluding with a gang of government agents, former or otherwise, to deprive us of our rights. It is in fact a crime. These Twitter people know who and what these “coworkers” of theirs are, and are contemplating a future with more consequential involvement with these people in courts of law and so on. Priceless.
Also keep in mind that Hoover’s habit was to deny the existence of organized crime until the dam burst with the New York State Troopers’ raid of the Appalachian, NY mob “Commission” meeting in 1957. Hoover was a founder of the FBI in 1937, and before that headed its precursor the Bureau of Investigation since 1924. How could he of all people have been expected to know that there was a crime syndicate running the country?
Keep in mind that had our congress not wanted the FBI to exist in the form I’ve described, it wouldn’t have and wouldn’t still.
A complete review of the constitutionality of all federal government agencies (at the least) is in order and only those agencies and departments with explicit constitutional justification should survive such an audit. I don’t think that the FBI would survive, nor should it.
And finally, don’t put it past the FBI, present or “former,” to censor Americans on Twitter or elsewhere. That’s pitch & catch compared to its sordid past. There’s a good reason why these nine FBI agents were chosen by @jack for their jobs unless, of course, he was only following orders.
Convention of States
Convention of States’ part in the battle for our nation’s soul is advocating an Article V convention of states to the legislatures of the fifty United States to amend the Constitution. This method bypasses our corrupt congress to reduce the scope and cost of the federal government to constitutional levels, enact a balanced budget amendment, and impose term limits for elected officials. Please sign our petition and look around on our web site. I recommend clicking the tab labeled Resources at the top. We’ll keep fighting for you until you join us, then we’ll fight together.
